Hindi Diwas: History, Constitutional Provisions And Significance
Source: Indian Express
GS II: Indian Constitution, Polity and Governance- Constitutional Provisions, Federalism and Linguistic Diversity.
Overview
- Hindi Diwas is observed on 14 September to mark the Constituent Assembly’s adoption of Hindi in the Devanagari script as the official language of the Union in 1949.
- The Munshi-Ayyangar formula sought to balance the role of Hindi with the continued use of English and recognition of India’s linguistic diversity.
- Articles 343–351 provide the constitutional framework for the Union’s official language, State languages and protection of linguistic interests.
- The continuation of English after 1965 highlights India’s approach of preserving national unity while respecting linguistic and regional diversity.
Why in the News?
Hindi Diwas is observed on 14 September to commemorate the adoption of Hindi in the Devanagiri script as the official language of the Union by the Constituent Assembly on 14 September 1949.
News in Brief
- On 14 September 1949, the Constituent Assembly adopted what became known as the Munshi-Ayyangar formula to settle the question of languages for official use in independent India.
- Instead of declaring Hindi the “national language”, the Constitution designated Hindi in Devanagari script as the official language of the Union, while allowing English to continue for official purposes for 15 years after the commencement of the Constitution.
- The compromise was incorporated into Articles 343–351 of Part XVII of the Constitution.
- The arrangement was intended as a 15-year transition, but opposition in non-Hindi-speaking States, particularly in the South, eventually led to the continuation of English alongside Hindi.
Background: India’s Language Question
- When India became independent, it was home to a wide range of languages and linguistic communities.
- Hindi had the largest number of speakers, while several regional languages had strong cultural and social roots in different parts of the country.
- English, which had been the language of colonial administration, continued to have an important role in government and higher education despite being spoken by a very small section of the population.
- The Constituent Assembly therefore had to address two practical questions: what language should be used for the Union’s official work, and how should India’s linguistic diversity be accommodated?
- The issue was closely connected with national integration, regional identity, administrative convenience and the protection of linguistic interests.
Hindi and English
- Many Hindi-speaking members wanted Hindi to replace English as the principal language of official communication.
- They viewed the adoption of an Indian language as an important step in moving away from the colonial past.
- They also believed that Hindi, because of its large speaker base, could help facilitate communication across the country.
- Seth Govind Das, for instance, supported the idea of establishing one common language and script for the country.
- However, members from non-Hindi-speaking regions were concerned that making Hindi dominant could place their languages and communities at a disadvantage.
- They argued that national unity did not require linguistic uniformity.
- S.K. Deo of Bombay highlighted the idea of “unity in diversity”, reflecting the broader concern that India’s linguistic differences needed to be accommodated rather than eliminated.
- Leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru also recognized the practical difficulties of making an immediate transition from English to Hindi.
Different views within the Constituent Assembly
The Assembly broadly reflected two contrasting positions.
- Hindi-Speaking members
- Supported Hindi as the principal language of the Union.
- Wanted the country to gradually move away from English.
- Considered an Indian language important for national identity.
- Non-Hindi-Speaking members
- Wanted safeguards against the dominance of Hindi.
- Favoured the continued use of English during the transition.
- Emphasized the importance of regional languages and linguistic diversity.
- There were also moderate voices that sought a practical middle path.
- They recognized that imposing an abrupt linguistic change could create unnecessary tensions and affect national integration.
Majority and Consensus
- The language question also raised an important issue about the method of decision-making.
- Some members favoured settling the matter through a majority vote, while others believed that such a sensitive issue should be resolved through mutual agreement and accommodation.
- The underlying concern was that a decision accepted only by a numerical majority might not work effectively across a linguistically diverse country.
- This made the language question an important example of the Constituent Assembly’s wider approach of balancing competing interests through constitutional compromise.
Concerns of Linguistic Minorities
- Several members emphasized that linguistic minorities should not feel excluded by the constitutional arrangement.
- S. P. Mookerjee cautioned against allowing a majoritarian approach to determine such an important question.
- Rajendra Prasad, the President of the Constituent Assembly, also recognised that the final arrangement had to be practical and capable of being implemented throughout the country.
- The objective was therefore not simply to select one language but to create a framework that could function within India’s federal and multilingual structure.
Munshi-Ayyangar Formula
- The language issue was eventually addressed through the Munshi-Ayyangar formula, associated with K. M. Munshi and N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar.
- The arrangement was incorporated into Part XVII of the Constitution, dealing with official language.
- Its broad approach was to give Hindi an important constitutional position while allowing continued use of English and recognizing the linguistic diversity of the country.
- Key features
- Hindi in the Devanagiri script was designated as the official language of the Union.
- English was permitted to continue for the official purposes during a 15-year transitional period from the commencement of the Constitution.
- The Constitution provided for the development and promotion of Hindi.
- States were given considerable scope to determine the language or languages used for their official purposes.
- The Constitution recognized the interests of linguistic minorities.
- The Eighth Schedule initially included 14 languages.
- Hindi is the official language of the Union, not the national language of India,
- The Constitution does not provide for any national language.
Constitutional Provisions: Articles 343-351
The Constitutional framework relating to official languages is contained in Part XVII.
| Article | Provision |
|---|---|
| Article 343 | Official language of the Union |
| Article 344 | Commission and Committee of Parliament on official language |
| Article 345 | Official language or languages of a State |
| Article 346 | Communication between States and the Union |
| Article 347 | Special provision relating to a language spoken by a section of a State’s population |
| Article 348 | Language used in the Supreme Court, High Courts and legislative texts |
| Article 349 | Special procedure for certain language-related laws |
| Article 350 | Language for submitting representations for grievances |
| Article 350A | Provision for mother-tongue instruction at the primary stage for linguistic minorities |
| Article 350B | Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities |
| Article 351 | Directive for promoting the development of Hindi |
What happened after 1965?
- The Constitution had originally envisaged a 15-year period during which English could continue alongside Hindi for official purposes.
- As the 1965 deadline approached, concerns grew in several non-Hindi-speaking States about the possible replacement of English by Hindi.
- Strong opposition, particularly in Tamil Nadu, resulted in widespread anti-Hindi protests during the 1960s.
- The Union government subsequently moved towards a policy that allowed English to continue alongside Hindi rather than making Hindi the sole language for Union official purposes.
Official Languages Act, 1963
- The Official Languages Act, 1963 provided the statutory basis for the continued use of English alongside Hindi for specified official purposes of the Union.
- This helped provide greater certainty to non-Hindi-speaking States and avoided a sudden shift in the language used for administration.
- The continued use of English also reflected the practical realities of India’s multilingual society.
Significance of the Language Settlement
India’s language policy is significant because it demonstrates how the Constitution accommodates diversity while maintaining national unity.
Key significance
- Strengthened national integration by avoiding a rigid one-language approach.
- Recognized India’s deep linguistic and cultural diversity.
- Balanced the importance of Hindi with the practical continuation of English.
- Protected the interests of States and linguistic minorities.
- Demonstrated the importance of constitutional accommodation and consensus-building.
- Reinforced India’s federal and plural character.
Unity without Uniformity
- The language settlement illustrates a broader principle of Indian constitutionalism: national unity does not necessarily require cultural or linguistic uniformity.
- India’s approach has instead been based on accommodation, allowing different linguistic identities to coexist within a common constitutional framework.
Conclusion
The Constituent Assembly’s approach to the language question reflected the complexities of governing a multilingual country. Rather than imposing an immediate linguistic transition, the constitutional framework sought to balance Hindi, English, regional languages and the interests of linguistic minorities.
The subsequent continuation of English showed that India’s language policy had to remain responsive to federal realities, regional aspirations and administrative needs. This makes the language settlement an important example of how Indian democracy has sought to preserve unity while respecting diversity.
UPSC Prelims and Mains Practice Question
Consider the following statements regarding India’s language provisions:
- Hindi in the Devanagari script is the official language of the Union.
- The Constitution declares Hindi to be India’s national language.
- The Eighth Schedule currently contains 22 languages.
- English was originally permitted to continue for official purposes for 15 years after the commencement of the Constitution.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A) 1, 2 and 3 only
B) 2,3 and 4 only
C) 1, 3 and 4 only
D) 1,2,3 and 4
Answer: 1, 3 and 4 only.
Mains Practice Question
Q) Discuss the significance of linguistic diversity in strengthening India’s unity and federal structure. (250 words)
Daily Current Affairs: Click Here