Scandinavian Social Democracy

Scandinavian Social Democracy
Source: Hindu
GS II: Constitution of India and Indian polity

What is discussed under Scandinavian Social Democracy?

The formation of a new right-wing administration in Sweden challenges the Nordic (or Scandinavian) Model of Social Democracy.

While the Social Democrats returned as the single largest party in Sweden’s recent elections, a split mandate left them with just 30.33% of the vote share.
The Social Democrats’ alliance, which also included the Centre Party, the Left Party, and the Green Party, had 173 seats, while the right-wing coalition led by the Moderate Party had 176.
The Moderate Party received 68 seats, two fewer than its previous result in 2018.
However, the far-right Sweden Democrats received 73 seats and 20.54% of the vote.

There are three Scandinavian nations geographically (Denmark, Sweden, and Norway).
Image by WikiImages from Pixabay
Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Finland, and the Faroe Islands are the six Scandinavian nations in terms of culture.
Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland are all part of the Nordic Region, as are the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and land.
The Nordic model, often known as the Scandinavian model, is the combination of Nordic nations’ social welfare and economic systems (Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland).
It mixes capitalist aspects such as a market economy with social advantages such as state pensions and income distribution.
The systems in Scandinavian nations are more akin to traditional social democrats.
All of these nations likewise follow a capitalist growth paradigm.

Advantages of the Nordic Model

The Nordic model promotes social mobility and equality.
Everyone gets free access to quality public services, including some of the world’s top education and healthcare, and people are content to pay their taxes to ensure that this continues.
These common advantages are combined with entrepreneurship, resulting in an effective mix of capitalism and socialism—or “cuddly capitalism,” as some put it.

Criticism of the Nordic Model

High taxes, a high level of government intervention, and relatively low GDP and productivity are factors limiting economic progress.
The nordic model redistributes assets, restricts the amount of money available for personal spending and consumption, and promotes dependency on government-subsidized programmes.
The Challenges faced by the Nordic model are the ageing population and influx of immigrants

The Nordic nations’ smaller and more homogeneous populations allow for more concentrated government.
The corporatist paradigm, which involves both capital and labour interests and is mediated by the government, has allowed for a more seamless transition from rural to industrial to post-industrial economies.
They emphasised social policies that encourage the spread of modern manufacturing, resulting in more and better-paying employment.
These nations’ Social Democratic Parties cemented democracy, resulting in equal citizenship rights and pragmatic class concessions.

Daily Current Affairs: Click Here

IAS Current Affairs